National Socialism with Chinese Characteristics – By John Garnaut | Foreign Policy

Two years ago, one of China’s most successful investment bankers broke away from his meetings in Berlin to explore a special exhibit that had caught his eye: “Hitler and the Germans: Nation and Crime.” In the basement of the German History Museum, He Di watched crowds uneasily coming to terms with how their ancestors had embraced the Nazi promise of “advancement, prosperity and the reinstatement of former national grandeur,” as the curators wrote in their introduction to the exhibit. He, vice-chairman of investment banking at the Swiss firm UBS, found the exhibition so enthralling, and so disturbing for the parallels he saw with back home, that he spent three days absorbing everything on Nazi history that he could find.

National Socialism with Chinese Characteristics – By John Garnaut | Foreign Policy

In china, we are looking at a combination of both national socialism and fascism.

Can China Be Described as ‘Fascist’? – NYTimes.com

Chinese politics is controlled by the Communist Party and its powerful families and factions, so when the son of a former party chief says the state is virtually “fascist,” it’s worth listening.

“The signs have long been there,” said Wang Lixiong, a prominent writer and scholar. “I feel there is a very clear trend toward fascism, and the source of fascism comes from the ever-growing power of the power holders.” China is “a police state,” he said, where power rules for power’s sake.

Can China Be Described as ‘Fascist’? – NYTimes.com

China shows signs of neo-fascism | 1913 Intel
China: The First Mature Fascist State | 1913 Intel
What are China’s global intentions? | Human Events | 1913 Intel
State Capitalism | 1913 Intel

Russia is moving down the path of Stalin and fascism as well:

They also bring into jarring relief how faithfully Putin has followed the Stalinist recipe. Like Putin, Stalin’s loyalists tolerated, for as long as necessary, certain trappings of democracy. But they made sure from the start to control the security organs — the KGB, by whatever name it took — and they made sure that the organs ultimately controlled everything else.

Like Putin, they also tolerated, for a while, some relatively free media. But the media that mattered — radio, after World War II; the television networks, for Putin — were quickly brought to heel.

Fred Hiatt: Following the Stalinist recipe in Russia – The Washington Post

Expert: Putin uses Stalin’s strategies – BarentsObserver | 1913 Intel
Putin Sees Stalin’s Industrialization as Model | Business | The …
Putin’s New ‘Fortress Russia’ – NYTimes.com | 1913 Intel
Gorbachev Calls Putin ‘Stalin’ | 1913 Intel
Rise to Power in Russia – Putin’s Reichstag Fire | 1913 Intel

Putins Russia and Nazi Germany both fit the requirement of the four main pillars of Fascism

When discussing theory you have to break out of the mindset that there are absolutes, as none exist. By definition we can call Nazi Germany National Socialism and Putin Russia democratic, but in reality, their shades show that they are more alike than some would like to think.

Putins Russia today has the same requirements in its system as fascism but with a modern twist

Putins Russia and Nazi Germany both fit the requirement of the four main pillars of Fascism:

Authoritarianism, Nationalism, Militarism and Preserved class hierarchy.

Putins Russia and Nazi Germany both fit the requirement of the four main pillars of Fascism | The pravda

Putin’s New ‘Fortress Russia’ – NYTimes.com

AS members of the Russian punk-rock band Pussy Riot appeal their two-year prison sentence for a political protest in Moscow’s Cathedral of Christ the Saviour, a pale of repression is settling over their country. This crackdown is wrapped in legislative garb, but the iron grip of authoritarianism is unmistakable.

Vladimir Putin’s tightening of the screws is a part of a broader pattern, which includes a return to confrontation with the United States and NATO. The United States must specifically recognize that its “reset” policy of see no evil, hear no evil has contributed to the trampling of human rights in Russia.

Moscow is cozying up to China, supporting the Assad regime in Syria and ignoring the Iranian nuclear race. The Kremlin is hard at work to create a sphere of influence along its periphery and a “pole” in the multipolar world that would stand up to Washington.

Recent developments have an unmistakably flavor of the 1920s and 1930s, …

Putin’s New ‘Fortress Russia’ – NYTimes.com

Russia is turning into a fascist state and a mafia state with Don Corleone Putin as its leader. In Bible prophecy circles some people are suggesting that Putin just might be Gog.  

RUSSIA WARNS ISRAEL NOT TO ATTACK IRAN: Prophetic implications? « Joel C. Rosenberg’s Blog

Another question I’m getting asked these days: Is Putin “Gog,” the evil leader described in the prophecies of Ezekiel 38-39? It came up during my recent speaking tour in Florida, and in a talk I gave to a group on Capitol Hill last week? Thus far, my answer remains the same — Putin is certainly “Gog-esque,” but it is too early to speculate on whether he is actually the biblical figure that will rise to power in Russia (known in Ezekiel’s prophecy as “Magog”) in the last days and build an alliance with Iran (“Persia”), Sudan (“Cush”), Turkey (“Gomer”), Libya and Algeria (“Put”), the countries of Central Asia (“Beth Togarmah”) to attack the State of Israel from “the north” (probably via Lebanon and Syria). That said, it is fair to say that geopolitical events over the past decade — and certainly over the past year or so — have been moving on a trajectory consistent with the fulfillment of Ezekiel 38-39. That doesn’t necessarily mean we will see the prophecies come to complete fulfillment in our lifetime or soon, but we cannot rule out the possibility.

RUSSIA WARNS ISRAEL NOT TO ATTACK IRAN: Prophetic implications? « Joel C. Rosenberg’s Blog

Joseph Stalin

Joseph Stalin was the Premier of the Soviet Union from 6 May 1941 until his death in 5 March 1953. Among the Bolshevik revolutionaries who brought about the Russian Revolution in 1917, Stalin held the position of General Secretary of the party’s Central Committee from 1922 until his death. While the office was initially not highly regarded, Stalin used it to consolidate more power after the death of Vladimir Lenin in 1924, gradually putting down all opposition. This included Leon Trotsky, the principal critic of Stalin among the early Soviet leaders. Whereas Trotsky advocated world permanent revolution, Stalin’s concept of socialism in one country became primary policy as he emerged the leader of the Soviet Union.

Joseph Stalin – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Leave a Reply