Tag Archives: Foreign Policy

Could the United States really go to war with China? | Foreign Policy

Are we on the brink of a new Cold War? The question isn’t as outlandish as it seemed only a few years ago. The United States is still the sole reigning superpower, but it is being challenged by the rising power of China, just as ancient Rome was challenged by Carthage, and Britain was challenged by Germany in the years before World War I. Should we therefore think of the United States and China as we once did about the United States and the Soviet Union, two gladiators doomed to an increasingly globalized combat until one side fades?

The Unstoppable Force vs. the Immovable Object – by Noah Feldman | Foreign Policy

The Coming Demographic Crisis | Hoover Institution

But as Jonathan Last documents in his new book What to Expect When No One’s Expecting, it is not overpopulation that threatens the well-being of the human race, it is under-population. As Last writes, “Throughout recorded human history, declining populations have always been followed by Very Bad Things.” Particularly for our modern, high-tech, capitalist world of consumers who buy, entrepreneurs who create wealth and jobs, and workers whose taxes fund social welfare entitlements, people are an even more critical resource.

Finally, foreign policy will increasingly be impacted by the global decline in fertility. Those who fear China as a future superpower threat to our interests should remember that by 2050, China’s population will be declining by 20 million every five years, and one out of four people will be over the age of 65. China’s public pension system covers only 365 million people and is unfunded by 150 percent of GDP. What we need to prepare for “is not a shooting war with an expansionist China,” Last writes, “but a declining superpower with a rapidly contracting economic base and an unstable political structure. It’s not clear which scenario is more worrisome.”

Let us not forget the other rapidly aging and shrinking superpower, Russia. It has a fertility rate of 1.3, and an average life expectancy of 66 years. By 2050, its population will be a third smaller than it is today. Russia’s current global belligerence under Vladimir Putin in part reflects the fact that, as Last writes, “the country has very little to lose.” A “wounded bear,” as Last calls Russia, armed with nuclear weapons is likely to remain a serious font of global disorder.

The Coming Demographic Crisis | Hoover Institution

What to Expect When No One’s Expecting: America’s Coming Demographic Disaster

Look around you and think for a minute: Is America too crowded?

For years, we have been warned about the looming danger of overpopulation: people jostling for space on a planet that’s busting at the seams and running out of oil and food and land and everything else.

It’s all bunk. The “population bomb” never exploded. Instead, statistics from around the world make clear that since the 1970s, we’ve been facing exactly the opposite problem: people are having too few babies. Population growth has been slowing for two generations. The world’s population will peak, and then begin shrinking, within the next fifty years. In some countries, it’s already started. Japan, for instance, will be half its current size by the end of the century. In Italy, there are already more deaths than births every year. China’s One-Child Policy has left that country without enough women to marry its men, not enough young people to support the country’s elderly, and an impending population contraction that has the ruling class terrified.

And all of this is coming to America, too. In fact, it’s already here. Middle-class Americans have their own, informal one-child policy these days. And an alarming number of upscale professionals don’t even go that far—they have dogs, not kids. In fact, if it weren’t for the wave of immigration we experienced over the last thirty years, the United States would be on the verge of shrinking, too.

What happened? Everything about modern life—from Bugaboo strollers to insane college tuition to government regulations—has pushed Americans in a single direction, making it harder to have children. And making the people who do still want to have children feel like second-class citizens.

What to Expect When No One’s Expecting explains why the population implosion happened and how it is remaking culture, the economy, and politics both at home and around the world.

Because if America wants to continue to lead the world, we need to have more babies.

What to Expect When No One’s Expecting: America’s Coming Demographic Disaster: Jonathan V. Last: 9781594036415: Amazon.com: Books

Amazon.Com comment:

94 of 98 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars

The lamps are going out in maternity wards all over the world, and we shall not see them lit again in our lifetime… February 4, 2013
By L.B.
Format:Hardcover

Having just finished this well-written and sobering look at fertility decline and the coming population implosion both here and abroad, I’m tempted to paraphrase Sir Edward Grey’s famous remark on the eve of the First World War: “The lamps are going out in maternity wards all over the world, and we shall not see them lit again in our lifetime…” Contrary to the worries of the overpopulation crowd, we’re simply not having enough babies, due to what the author describes as a “giant constellation” of factors — and the likely consequences of this global baby bust are grim.

Demographics can be a tricky subject to write about, and difficult to read about. But have no fear — Mr. Last lays out the facts and data about our demographic & fertility dilemma clearly and thoroughly (and in under 200 pages sans footnotes!); he teases out the implications of these facts judiciously; and he does it all with enough dark humor and interesting vignettes to make the demographic medicine go down easy. (One fascinating example: He notes that last year in Japan — a nation well-advanced in a demographic death spiral — consumers bought more adult diapers than diapers for babies, for the first time ever. Let that nugget sink in for a minute.) Mr. Last is clear-eyed about the probable consequences of population decline, and he does a fine job showing its likely effects on everything from the unsustainability of our entitlement programs to foreign policy to American economic growth and innovation — while always cautioning that Demography is not inevitably Destiny.

No doubt some will assume the author wants to pin blame on feminism, or on selfish women who sacrifice motherhood for careers. I would respectfully ask such persons to read the book with an open mind, because Mr. Last does no such thing. In fact, he goes out of his way to say that our birth dearth results not from some sinister anti-family conspiracy, but from a whole variety of causes, many of them unquestionable goods (e.g., the decline in infant mortality rates, the greater career opportunities available to women, even something as mundane as child car-seat laws). But as he notes, even net goods like these can come at a broader social cost.

Certainly, Mr. Last doesn’t shy away from discussing the real effects on fertility of things like the invention of the birth-control pill, or the rise of cohabitation and no-fault divorce (and their negative effect on marriage) — and he makes no secret of his own (conservative) views on these topics. But as another reviewer noted above, he scrupulously refrains from preaching on these matters. In fact, he’s even willing to highlight data suggesting, for example, that abortion might not reduce fertility rates nearly as much as you’d think. His intellectual honesty shines through on every page of the book.

Mr. Last concludes with a chilling observation: Our looming demographic crisis shows that after a century of trying, we have still not figured out “how to balance liberalism, modern economics, and family life.” Resolving this conundrum is a matter of utmost importance for America and for all nations in the 21st century. “What to Expect…” is a much-needed conversation-starter on this topic, and a lucid and engaging tour through our increasingly barren landscape (if you’ll pardon the pun!).

New START Treaty: The unilateral disarming of US nuclear forces

In other words, New START provided Moscow an incentive to go up, not down, in strategic nuclear arms. As for the United States, New START will reduce the number of deployed delivery vehicles by about one-fourth. Given these facts, it is perhaps understandable why the new secretary of state chose to say nothing about nuclear reductions, which was, after all, the treaty’s ostensible objective. The one-sided nature of the actual reductions certainly looks more like unilateral disarmament than mutual, bilateral reductions.

Time for Kerry to Face Facts – By Robert Joseph and Eric Edelman | Foreign Policy

Israel’s Three Gambles | Foreign Policy

Can Israel get away with its attacks on the Syrian regime?

Israel’s recent attacks against Syria are the latest, dramatic development in a conflict that is already spiraling out of control. In the past few days, Israeli aircraft reportedly targeted Iranian surface-to-surface missiles headed for Hezbollah, as well as Syrian missiles in a military base in the outskirts of Damascus. Israel’s strikes show, once again, its intelligence services’ ability to penetrate the Iran’s arms shipment route to Lebanon and its military’s skill in striking adversaries with seeming impunity. But Israel is also risking retaliation and further destabilization of its own neighborhood — in ways that may come back to haunt it.

Israel’s Three Gambles – By Daniel Byman and Natan Sachs | Foreign Policy

Sergei Lavrov and the blunt logic of Russian power

But Lavrov, a diplomat since the Brezhnev era who has spent a lifetime haggling, blustering, scheming, and speechifying on behalf of the battered Russian state (“his religion,” one top U.S. official told me), chose to go in a different direction, right back in history to Alexander Gorchakov. He cited the princely foreign minister as an example of the blunt style in Russian politics, as a reason for why Russia has absolutely no intention of following America’s lead in the Arab world — or, by extension, anywhere else. Gorchakov, Lavrov proudly noted, had managed “the restoration of the Russian influence in Europe after the defeat in the Crimean War, and he did it … without moving a gun. He did it exclusively through diplomacy.”

When Lavrov did get around to the question at hand, of foreign policy in Putin’s Russia, he offered a sharp lecture on how the Kremlin’s boss had managed to make Russia great again after the indignities of the 1990s — and, more to the point, how a great Russia can once again afford to have an “assertive” foreign policy:

Minister No – By Susan B. Glasser | Foreign Policy

Imad Mughniyeh: Inside the mysterious death and life of the world’s most dangerous terrorist

On this night, he was in a hurry. He exited his apartment building and walked quickly to his SUV, crossing behind the tailgate to the driver’s side door. He never made it. Instead, a remotely detonated explosive, containing hundreds of deadly, cube-shaped metal shards, ripped his body to shreds, lifting it into the air and depositing his burning torso 15 feet away on the apartment building’s lawn.

Just like that, the most dangerous man you never heard of was dead, his whole career proof that one person really can reshape politics in the Middle East — and far beyond it. “Both bin Laden and Mughniyeh were pathological killers,” 30-year veteran CIA officer Milton Bearden told me. “But there was always a nagging amateurishness about bin Laden — his wildly hyped background, his bogus claims.… Bin Laden cowered and hid. Mughniyeh spent his life giving us the finger.”

The Driver – By Mark Perry | Foreign Policy

China’s ruthless foreign policy is shaping the world in dangerous ways | Full Comment | National Post

Are we witnessing the end of the “American age”? It depends whom you ask. But one thing is certain: Thanks to the near-bankruptcy of the American welfare state, Washington is losing both the means and desire to project power across the world. Inevitably, nations with deeper pockets — China, most notably — will fill the void.

This process already is underway in many parts of the world. That includes large swathes of Central Asia, where Beijing’s billions are beginning to revolutionize regional infrastructure and alliances — in dazzling but potentially dangerous ways.

Analyzing Beijing’s foreign policy is a relatively simple exercise. That’s because, unlike the United States and other Western nations, China doesn’t even pretend to operate on any other principle except naked self-interest.

China’s ruthless foreign policy is shaping the world in dangerous ways | Full Comment | National Post

 ‘They seem to want to get into a fight’: Asia on guard as China flexes its foreign policy muscles

So does China’s desire to throw its weight around the neighbourhood, make military conflict inevitable? There is certainly genuine concern among China watchers, as the country struggles to find its place in the world. “China reminds me of a teenage 16-year-old boy who has suddenly discovered he is very powerful but has never tested his strength. They seem to want to get into a fight,” said one diplomat.

Asia on guard as China flexes its foreign policy muscles | Full Comment | National Post

Xi’s War Drums – By John Garnaut | Foreign Policy

Fanell, in comments that went largely unnoticed outside the small circle of China military specialists, spelled out in rare detail the reasons the United States is shifting 60 percent of its naval assets — including its most advanced capabilities — to the Pacific. He was blunt: The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy is focused on war, and it is expanding into the “blue waters” explicitly to counter the U.S. Pacific Fleet. “I can tell you, as the fleet intelligence officer, the PLA Navy is going to sea to learn how to do naval warfare,” he said. “My assessment is the PLA Navy has become a very capable fighting force.”

Some were shocked to hear the extent and intensity of China’s carefully orchestrated maritime provocations, especially coming from an officer whose job may make him more of an expert on Beijing’s naval maneuverings than anyone outside China. Others wondered whether the Pacific Fleet was simply playing the Washington game, perhaps lobbying for a greater share of the U.S. military budget or wider authority to act by magnifying the threat.

Xi’s War Drums – By John Garnaut | Foreign Policy

US Interference in Syria: Russia, China, and Iran might have something to say about that

Russia and China could most forcefully teach a lesson to the United States in the realm of Iran’s nuclear research program, a central U.S. concern. With the region in flux, China and Russia could forgo their traditional opposition to Iranian nuclear proliferation and block U.S.-backed sanctions against Iran in the International Atomic Energy Agency and the U.N. Security Council, or erect obstacles in the P5+1 negotiations. By undermining these diplomatic efforts, Russia and China would prevent Washington from acquiring the international mandate it would need to take military action against Iran if necessary. Arguably, this could no more deter the United States in Iran than did international intransigence slow efforts to move against Iraq in 2003. But times are different. The United States has based its entire campaign against Iran on international solidarity; losing that backing could undercut support among the U.S. public, which remains wary of entering new battles a decade after “Shock and Awe.” And let’s be clear: Iran, China, and Russia have far more strategic, diplomatic, and economic clout to wield against the United States than Iraq did in 2003.

Intervention Escalation – By James F. Jeffrey | Foreign Policy

How China may use current crisis to extract big concessions from India | NDTV.com

India has also reiterated the need to prevent the escalation of hostilities. But an assessment by the army, intelligence agencies, and the foreign affairs ministry concludes that the incursion was what a source described as “a well-thought out decision cleared at the highest level and not a localised action.”

The Indian military has told the government that China’s army commanders want to use the current crisis to push through a proposal first made by the Chinese Defence Minister, Chang Wanquan, during his visit to India last November. He had said that both countries should notify each other about their patrol plans all along the Line of Actual Control, which India has resisted because it removes the opportunity to take the other side by surprise, if needed.

However, sources say, despite the Army’s reservations on this count, the government may agree to this proposal to end the current crisis.

How China may use current crisis to extract big concessions from India | NDTV.com

Strategically, China has made the decision to become aggressive with its foreign policy. Here it is an incursion into Indian territory. There is also the Senkaku Islands conflict with Japan. The conflict with the Philippines. The conflict with Vietnam. The arms build-up threatening Taiwan.

In a way China’s extremely rapid growth over the last 20 years is a sign of a bubble. Now we can see that China is reaching its greatest power, just as there are signs it is cracking underneath. Outwardly it is changing into an aggressive foreign power toward its neighbors. These are signs that the bubble is in danger of bursting. Hold onto your seat. Things are about to get worse.