Their gamble is that if we give the Organization of Islamic Cooperation just a little something — just a “harmless” little law — then we might all just be able to get along. But for every inch of encouragement the free nations of the world give the OIC, the more Reza Jabbaris we sacrifice — and a million more free-thinking souls.
How to deal with one madman is tricky enough, but how do you rectify things if the whole world has gone mad? Take Sweden and its apparent determination to deport Reza Jabbari back to his native Iran, most likely to be killed for having converted from Islam to Christianity.Sponsored Ads
First, there is the growing phenomenon of individuals being targeted for retribution if they have been seen to “insult” Islam. In particular there is the terrible recent case of Lars Hedegaard, who was targeted by an assassin at his home in Denmark earlier this month. The larger tapestry that hangs behind incidents such as the attempted assassination of Lars Hedegaard, Kurt Westergaard and others, however, is not just the attempt to silence a few brave voices, but the attempt to silence an entire planet. I refer of course to the attempt to criminalize – around the world – any speech which is deemed to be offensive to Islam.
This process is not only ongoing among the 57 Islamic countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), but is being considered – rather than laughed out of the room – by, among other countries, the United States of America.
Steve Emerson has written a devastating crtitique of Brennan on FOX News.com yesterday:http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/02/07/john-brennan-is-wrong-man-for-cia/, and this morning, on “FOX&Friends,” former CIA counter-intelligence office Michael Scheuer said that Brennan was an “excellent liar.” ( Note: I have not been able as yet to find a clip of that segment.)
And then there is this recently uncovered clip from 2010 of Brennan speaking of “the beauty of Islam”:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VQbAhqHoAo. He openly recounts his long history of living, and going to school, in the Middle East.
Russia’s military spending is on the rise but it doesn’t mean the country is going to war, Russian PM Dmitry Medvedev has told reporters of five TV channels during his televised speech Friday.
When asked if Russia was pondering a military attack against anyone, Mr. Medvedev smiled and said that would be most unfortunate.
“We aren’t going to fight anyone. We are a peace-loving nation,” he said.
Voice of Russia
This is a violation of the first rule of peace: If you have to remind us about how peaceful you are, then you are not peaceful. Let’s add Russia to the list of peace: Islam, China and Russia. I’m waiting to add Iran, North Korea and Venezuela.
The nation’s progress ‘is absolutely not a challenge or threat to other countries’, vice-president tells foreign delegation
“China is following a path of peaceful development,” Xi told the experts, who are all working in China.
He added that the country’s progress was not detrimental to other countries. China’s development “is absolutely not a challenge or threat to other countries. China will not seek hegemony or expansionism,” Xi said.
The first rule of peace: If you have to remind people that you are peaceful, then you are NOT peaceful. I keep telling Muslims this rule every-time I hear how peaceful Islam is. Now I will have to tell it to the Chinese. We know peace (peaceful) when we see it. Nobody has to remind us. If you feel you have to remind us, then you know you have a problem.
The second rule of peace: Islam and China are not peaceful.
The third rule of peace: If you want peace, then prepare for war.
The fourth rule of peace: The rise of modern liberalism has made the West go insane. It is preparing for peace. All sane people should get ready for war. The US is blazing a new peaceful future by the unilateral elimination of all nuclear weapons one step at a time. This is a disaster in the making.
This is the first part of a four-part Israeli documentary by Zvi Yehezkeli and David Deryi about the Islamization of Europe. It has been translated from the Hebrew and subtitled in English.
The filmmaker is an Arabic-speaking Israeli whose appearance and flawless Arabic accent were sufficient to allow him to mingle freely with the Muslims in several “no-go zones” in Sweden and France, and to get an inside look at the Islamic mindset within the greater European community.
Many thanks to DarLink for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
Eurabia Flag (Arabic script means – In the Name of Allah):
Muslim immigrants in a town near Copenhagen have forced the cancellation of traditional Christmas displays this year even while spending lavishly on the Islamic Eid celebration marking the end of Ramadan.
The controversy has escalated into an angry nationwide debate over the role of Islam in post-Christian Denmark, where a burgeoning Muslim population is becoming increasingly assertive in imposing its will on a wide range of social and civic issues.
The latest dust-up involves the Egedalsvænget housing complex in Kokkedal, a town situated some 30 kilometers (20 miles) north of Copenhagen where Arab and Turkish immigrants now comprise more than half the total population.
The world needs a global capital and it should be the capital of Islamic Turkey, Istanbul, according to a UN special representative. Richard Falk, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Palestinian human rights, wrote a Nov. 1, 2012, opinion piece for the controversial al Jazeera English site calling for a “global capital” because of integration “by markets, by globally constituted battlefields, by changing geopolitical patterns.”
I’ve been continuing to work on my little “666” project. Check it out if you haven’t viewed it recently. One question I had about 666 was where did John actually see 666? Based on the idea that John’s image needs two rotations to get to “In the Name of Allah” and two swords, then it was likely that John was viewing a banner hung vertically. He was at a rally.
After much thinking I came to the conclusion that John was probably viewing some kind of Islamic one world rally in Istanbul. He was probably viewing from near the front stage looking out at the audience. There would be many banners with “In the Name of Allah” with two swords underneath. However, John would not be viewing the banners from the front. He would be viewing them from behind so the audience could see them from the front. While the audience saw “In the Name of Allah” with two swords in Arabic in the front, John’s view gave him 666 in Greek in the back.
The determination of city is based on the destruction of America, Russia, China, Europe, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Egypt. Islam is seeking to dominate the entire world. So where would I put the city? We are just starting to see the rise of the old Ottoman Empire in Turkey which brings us to Istanbul. We can note that Istanbul was the capitol of the old Ottoman Empire and also one of the capitols for the old Roman Empire. Istanbul is high up on the list of cities and the most logical choice.
A UN representative calling for a world capitol in Istanbul just might be confirmation that Istanbul does end up being a world capitol. It also might be where John saw 666.
To look at those faces twisted with hatred – those human beings transformed into ferocious beasts, filled with savage indignation and, by all indications, prepared to tear their fellowman limb from limb – was to stare into the very heart of contemporary Europe’s darkness. It’s one thing to read about the history of Europe from the storming of the Bastille to the present day; it’s another thing to see the most cataclysmic, psychopathic turning points of the last couple of centuries vividly mirrored, as it were, before one’s eyes.
They wanted to get at Robert Spencer, the Islam critic, and tear him limb from limb. A similar group was at work protesting a Geert Wilders speech.
In 1941, FDR proposed his famous Four Freedoms. Some seventy years later it may be time to add a fifth freedom to that list. Freedom from Islam.
Freedom from Islam would have seemed like an unlikely candidate back in 1941 when the worry was over secular ideologies, but as the West and its ideologies have fallen into a soporific state of decline, the fascism that concerns us no longer wears a military uniform or any of the trappings of nationalism, but instead wraps itself in the turban of religion.
Despite all this wealth, created by non-Muslims for Muslims, where Islam goes then poverty soon follows. Even with wealth, the Muslim world remains a place of great poverty where powerful families and organizations control access to the economy and women are kept out of the workplace. Muslim economic failure has been chronicled elsewhere and yet it is worth noting that Muslim immigration fills up not only the prisons of the West, but also its social service centers.
A protest by 10,000 Muslims outside the offices of Google in London today is just the first in an orchestrated attempt to force the company to remove an anti-Islamic film from website YouTube in Britain.
Thousands had travelled from as far afield as Glasgow to take part in the
demonstration, ahead of a planned million-strong march in Hyde Park in
Anger over ‘The Innocence of Muslims’, an American-produced film which insults the Prophet Mohammad and demeans Muslims, according to protesters, remains available to watch on the website YouTube, a subsidiary of Google.
Organiser Masoud Alam said: “Our next protest will be at the offices of
Google and YouTube across the world. We are looking to ban this film.
Is Islam just a religion, or does it also include a political system seeking to squash freedom in the West?
Is the age of freedom coming to an end?