Tag Archives: Rsquo - Page 2

Ring row: Putin steals Super Bowl ring, says it was a gift | chicagotribune.com

Vladimir Putin’s opponents often brand him a “thief” at street protests. Now the Kremlin is dismissing an American football team owner’s account of how the Russian president ended up with his diamond-encrusted Super Bowl ring when they met eight years ago.

According to the New York Post, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft told the audience at a recent awards ceremony that he had intended only to show Putin the ring, worth more than $25,000, but that Putin had pocketed it.

Ring row: Kremlin says Super Bowl ring was a gift to Putin – chicagotribune.com

This story is actually old but has now come out again. Godfather Putin just can’t help himself. Whatever he wants he gets. Most of all he wants to be feared. The Super Bowl ring is a bonus.

Vladimir Putin: ‘the godfather of a mafia clan’ – Telegraph [Posted by Matt on May 31, 2012]

‘He’s a tiny, mean guy who will bite you if you get too close; and that’s the kind of country he’s tried to build. And that’s been the extent of Russian foreign policy for the last 12 years. What is Russia’s foreign policy agenda? You can’t figure it out from who Russia becomes friends with or sells arms to or negotiates with, because it’s really simple. Russia wants to be feared. That’s it.’

Gessen likens Putin to ‘the godfather of a mafia clan’ ruling Russia. And ‘like all mafia bosses, he barely distinguishes between his personal property, the property of his clan and the property of those beholden to his clan.’

Corruption has been virtually institutionalised under his regime. Last year the Transparency International ‘Corruptions Perception Index’ ranked Russia joint 143rd out of the 182 countries listed, along with Nigeria and Mauritania.

Putin’s own acquisitiveness is typified, Gessen says, in two apparently minor but telling incidents. In 2005, while hosting a group of American businessmen in St Petersburg, Putin pocketed a diamond-encrusted ring belonging to Robert Kraft, the owner of the New England Patriots American football team, after asking to try it on, and allegedly saying, ‘I could kill someone with this.’ After a flurry of articles in the US press, Kraft announced the ring had been a gift, preventing an uncomfortable situation from spiralling out of control.

Later that year, Putin was a guest at the Guggenheim museum in New York. At one point his hosts brought out a conversation piece – a glass replica of a Kalashnikov automatic weapon filled with vodka (which can be picked up in Russia for about $300). According to Gessen, Putin nodded to his bodyguards, who took the piece away, ‘leaving the hosts speechless’. ‘I do suspect it’s a compulsion,’ she says. ‘And another reason I suspect it’s a compulsion is because of the palace.’

Vladimir Putin: ‘the godfather of a mafia clan’ – Telegraph

Banks Cooking Up Another Financial Crisis

Wall Street is cooking up another crisis—making shoddy loans and selling worthless securities to investors hungry for higher yields than CDs and government bonds offer.

Dodd-Frank banking reforms imposed very costly regulations on mortgage and commercial lending. Regional banks, which have solid knowledge of smaller businesses, could not bear these costs and sold out to large Wall Street institutions. Now a handful of money center banks control more than half the deposits and lendable money.

Although big banks have branches everywhere and are flush with funds, they don’t know much about which businesses are likely to repay what they borrow.

Banks Cooking Up Another Financial Crisis

In New Book, Former US Army Officer Warns of Romancing China | Defense News | defensenews.com

Wortzel writes that, “astonishingly,” PLA officers do not seem to be discussing how the US might react to blinding or attacking the US Defense Support Program (DSP) of early warning satellites, which are intended to monitor foreign ballistic missile launches. The result could precipitate a preemptive strike against Chinese ballistic missile bases in response to China’s attacking the DSP system. “Such thinking in the Second Artillery without considering the reaction that such an attack might bring can lead to serious nuclear instability.”

In some ways, particularly in its strategic nuclear warfare capabilities, China is still an enigma for Wortzel and others in the field.

There is some “controversy” over the size of China’s nuclear force. The US Defense Department maintains that China has about 55 to 65 intercontinental ballistic missiles and about 200 nuclear warheads. Estimates out of Taiwan and the London-based International Institute of Strategic Studies are twice as high, and the former chief of staff of Russia’s strategic missile forces Col. Gen. Viktor Esin estimates that China may have as many as 1,600 to 1,800 warheads and bombs.

“The differences in the estimates of the size of China’s arsenal are significant because they affect US deterrent policy, decisions on ballistic missile defense, and arms control discussions, especially with Russia.”

In New Book, Former US Army Officer Warns of Romancing China | Defense News | defensenews.com

The Dragon Extends its Reach: Chinese Military Power Goes Global

China has evolved from a nation with local and regional security interests to a major economic and political power with global interests, investments, and political commitments. It now requires a military that can project itself around the globe, albeit on a limited scale, to secure its interests. Therefore, as Larry M. Wortzel explains, the Chinese Communist Party leadership has charged the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) with new and challenging missions that require global capabilities.

Advances in technology and the development of indigenous weapons platforms in China, combined with reactions to modern conflicts, have produced a military force very different from that which China has fielded in the past. Wortzel presents a clear and sobering picture of the PLA’s modernization effort as it expands into space and cyberspace, and as it integrates operations in the traditional domains of war.

This book will appeal to the specialist in security and foreign policy issues in Asia as well as to the person interested in arms control, future warfare, and global military strategies. The book puts China’s military growth into historical context for readers of recent military and diplomatic history.

The Dragon Extends its Reach: Chinese Military Power Goes Global: Larry M. Wortzel: 9781612344058: Amazon.com: Books

In Golan Heights, Druze villagers are bracing for a Syria-Israel war | Toronto Star

In this crowded hillside village that straddles Israel’s border with Syria, everyone seems certain that war is on the way. The village, which faces Syria to the northeast and Israel to the southwest, has watched with nervous anticipation as Israel’s military has heightened preparations along the border and Syrian tanks can be seen manoeuvring in the distance. Residents have cleaned out bomb shelters and hospitals have run emergency drills.

“You don’t witness as many wars as we do without getting a sense when one is about to land on your doorstep,” said Maryam al-Din, a 78-year-old resident of Majdal Shams. “Ask anyone in the village, anyone in the villages around, and they will tell you that if you put your ear to the ground, you will clearly hear that war is coming to this place.”

In Golan Heights, Druze villagers are bracing for a Syria-Israel war | Toronto Star

Putin’s Self-Destruction | Foreign Affairs

utin has pledged that this is only the beginning. He and his advisers know well that attacks on corruption are popular with the public. They are counting on the campaign to shore up support after the protests and to mobilize Putin’s supporters. What the Kremlin is neglecting, however, is that the campaign could be a double-edged sword that ultimately delegitimizes the regime, as Putin’s own acolytes are swept out while the government’s house is cleaned.

Putin faces a critical moment and is at risk of losing his sway over the elites.

FROM GORBACHEV TO PUTIN

The fate of Mikhail Gorbachev’s anti-alcohol campaign in the last years of the Soviet Union should have provided a warning. …

Putin’s Self-Destruction | Foreign Affairs

A schism in Islam is ripping the Middle East apart – FT.com

The US will be courting danger in Syria but staying out is a greater risk, writes David Gardner

President Barack Obama’s decision to send unspecified “direct military support” to Syria’s rebels may have as its proximate cause the now firm US conviction that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons against them. But it will be seen across the Middle East as a choice by America to throw its weight behind a Sunni alliance against Iran-led Shia forces across the region – a conflict in which Syria is the frontline.

A schism in Islam is ripping the Middle East apart – FT.com

Could Syria be the spark that causes the Middle East to explode? – Bill Neely – Mirror Online

Into this bloodbath, the West is about to send planeloads of weapons.

Syria’s rebels, a loose alliance of army deserters, Sunni civilians and al-Qaeda-linked fanatics, are now to be armed to the teeth by the world’s only superpower.

It’s one thing for a few thousand fighters from Hezbollah to join the war, or for the Gulf state of Qatar to supply weapons… It’s quite another for the world’s strongest power to back Sunni rebels against Shia forces in a civil war.

America has a poor record in the Middle East. It may be about to get worse. And the war threatens to get worse, too.

Already the danger is not just deadlier fighting within Syria. That’s already happening.

Government forces are beginning a new offensive against rebels who control half of the second city, Aleppo.

Fresh from victory in the strategic town of Qusair, the army is turning to the city of Homs, the cockpit of the revolution.

Could Syria be the spark that causes the Middle East to explode? – Bill Neely – Mirror Online

Washington to arm Syrian rebels, officials say | The Times of Israel

President Barack Obama has authorized sending weapons to Syrian rebels for the first time, US officials said, after the White House disclosed that the United States has conclusive evidence President Bashar Assad’s government used chemical weapons against opposition forces trying to overthrow him.

Obama has repeatedly said the use of chemical weapons would cross a “red line,” suggesting it would trigger greater US intervention in the two-year crisis that has killed 93,000 people.

Washington to arm Syrian rebels, officials say | The Times of Israel

Will a bipolar world be peaceful?

This is a timely book. Throughout history, rising powers have come to blows with waning ones: think of Germany in 1914 or Japan in the 1930s. Some suppose that a rising China is doomed to clash violently with America. Not necessarily so, says Mr Feldman. Both sides have too much to lose. Economically, they are more intimately entwined than any previous pair of rivals.

The old Soviet block barely traded with the West. China not only trades with America on a stupendous scale but also holds much of its debt. A trade embargo would cripple China’s economy. That would undermine the Communist Party’s main claim to legitimacy: that China has prospered under its rule. And that in turn would threaten the party’s precious grip on power. So it “would simply be irrational” for China and America to go to war, Mr Feldman writes.

Alas, just because something is irrational does not mean it will not happen. The Communist Party’s other claim to legitimacy is that it embodies Chinese nationalism. As growth slows and the Chinese people tire of being robbed by corrupt officials, Beijing may feel tempted to crank up the aggression in its backyard.

China and America: After you | The Economist

Cool War: The Future of Global Competition: Noah Feldman: 9780812992748: Amazon.com: Books

A bold and thought-provoking look at the future of U.S.-China relations, and how their coming power struggle will reshape the competitive playing field for nations around the world
 
The Cold War seemingly ended in a decisive victory for the West. But now, Noah Feldman argues, we are entering an era of renewed global struggle: the era of Cool War. Just as the Cold War matched the planet’s reigning superpowers in a contest for geopolitical supremacy, so this new age will pit the United States against a rising China in a contest for dominance, alliances, and resources. Already visible in Asia, the conflict will extend to the Middle East (U.S.-backed Israel versus Chinese-backed Iran), Africa, and beyond.
 
Yet this Cool War differs fundamentally from the zero-sum showdowns of the past: The world’s major power and its leading challenger are economically interdependent to an unprecedented degree. Exports to the U.S. account for nearly a quarter of Chinese trade, while the Chinese government holds 8 percent of America’s outstanding debt. This positive-sum interdependence has profound implications for nations, corporations, and international institutions. It makes what looked to be a classic contest between two great powers into something much more complex, contradictory, and badly in need of the shrewd and carefully reasoned analysis that Feldman provides.
 
To understand the looming competition with China, we must understand the incentives that drive Chinese policy. Feldman offers an arresting take on that country’s secretive hierarchy, proposing that the hereditary “princelings” who reap the benefits of the complicated Chinese political system are actually in partnership with the meritocrats who keep the system full of fresh talent and the reformers who are trying to root out corruption and foster government accountability. He provides a clear-eyed analysis of the years ahead, showing how China’s rise presents opportunities as well as risks. Robust competition could make the U.S. leaner, smarter, and more pragmatic, and could drive China to greater respect for human rights. Alternatively, disputes over trade, territory, or human rights could jeopardize the global economic equilibrium—or provoke a catastrophic “hot war” that neither country wants.
 
The U.S. and China may be divided by political culture and belief, but they are also bound together by mutual self-interest. Cool War makes the case for competitive cooperation as the only way forward that can preserve the peace and make winners out of both sides.

Praise for Cool War
 
“Feldman is a sensitive and incisive observer of what he has coined the ‘Cool War’ between the [United States and China]. . . . A crisp writer, Feldman has a fine eye for telling anecdotes, which he uses to frame nearly every chapter. . . . Neither overly optimistic nor pessimistic, Feldman lays out a compelling case for why the neither-allies-nor-enemies standing between the two powers is tenuous but not necessarily doomed to topple into hot war. Current affairs books always run the risk of going rather quickly from the New Releases shelf to the remainder bin, but Feldman’s book carries enough insight to warrant serious attention from anyone interested in what may well be the defining relationship in global affairs for decades to come.”Kirkus Reviews

“By giving realism and liberal internationalism their due, and by giving credence to both naked self-interest and legal norms, Noah Feldman’s dissection of the United States–China relationship is smart, balanced, and wise.”—Robert D. Kaplan, New York Times bestselling author of The Revenge of Geography

Cool War: The Future of Global Competition: Noah Feldman: 9780812992748: Amazon.com: Books

SMITH: China draws a line in the ocean – Washington Times

The United States and China have a very sharp disagreement on whether U.S. warships must first seek Beijing’s permission to operate in China’s economic zone. Beijing thinks they do, and has passed domestic legislation making such activity illegal. The United States thinks they do not, and continues to operate its warships in China’s zone, as it has always done. Most experts think the United States is on firmer legal footing and a majority of the world’s capitals align with the U.S. position, but China is not alone: 26 other countries insist on “home state consent” for foreign military activities in their zone.

However, China is the only state that has “operationally challenged” U.S. warships on multiple occasions. Where other countries lodge diplomatic protests, Chinese ships have forced dangerous confrontations at sea, and at least one in the air. For example:

SMITH: China draws a line in the ocean – Washington Times